ESTIMATING ENERGY SAVING POTENTIAL BY TAKING INTO ACCOUNT INTERDEPENDENCE EFFECT CASE STUDY: HIGH RISE OFFICE BUILDING IN JAKARTA
Abstract
Abstract: The purpose of this study is making comparison between calculation of the potential for energy savings without and with taking into account the interdependency effect based on a case study in a conditioned high rise office building in Jakarta. Accurate estimation of the energy saving potential will increase the confidence level in bankable investment of energy saving projects. This will minimize the uncertainty of achievable energy savings which can prevent investment risks during implementing energy conservation and efficiency projects. The results of this study based on a study case, indicate that estimated energy savings of ESM-1 e.g. retrofit of lighting increase 4.29% when the interdependency effect is taking into account. ESM-2 e.g. installation of variable speed drive (VSD) on the air handling unit (AHU) shows the estimated energy saving increase 22.75% by taking into account interdependency effect. The effect of this interdependence both ESM-1 and ESM-2 is a reduction in cooling load in buildings. Totally, the calculation of the interdependency effect will increase the percentage of the total estimate of potential energy savings from 34.23% to 39.05% based on the energy baseline with a predefined baseyear periode, around 4.82% increased. The calculation of the interdependency effect will be very influential in minimizing uncertainty when the projects are financed by an energy performance contract mechanism whether a guaranteed or shared saving scheme. The measurement and verification energy saving during reporting period should be conducted in the future to compare the energy saving projection before ESMs implementation and measurement and verification results.
References
2. A. Magrini, L. F. (2016). Energy audit of public building: the energy consumption of a University with modern and historical buildings. Some results. Energy Procedia 101, Science Direct, 169-175.
3. Akbarova Samira, M. N. (2018). Multi-disciplinary Energy Auditing of Educational Buildings in Azerbaijan: Case Study at a University Campus. Science Direct-IPAC PaperOnLine 51-30, 311-315.
4. Anders Larsen, M. J. (2019). Evaluation of energy audits and the regulator . Science Direct-Energy Policy (207), 557-564.
5. Badan Standardisasi Nasional. (2019). SNI ISO 50015. Jakarta: BSN.
6. Bo Shen, L. P. (2012). Energy audit practices in China: National and local experiences and issues . Science Direct-Energy Policy (46), 346-358.
7. Carlo F. Bonacina, G. M. (2015). Investmen grade audit: a financial tool for the cost - effectivenes renovation of residential building. Science Direct- Energy Procedia (70), 709-718.
8. Colburn, B. K. (2019). Converting Energy Saving Opportunities into Implemented Energy Saving Measures (ESMs). England: EPS Capital Corps.
9. Cosimo Marinosci, G. L. (2015). Preliminary energy audit of the historical building of the School of Engineering and Architechture of Bologna. Science Direct-Procedia (81), 64-75.
10. Eleonora Annunziata, F. R. (2014). Enhancing energy efficiency in public buildings: The role local energy audit programmes . Science Direct - Energy Policy (69), 364-373.
11. Fabrizio Ascione, M. B. (2019). Energy refurbishment of a University building in cold Italian backcountry. Part 1: Audit and calibration of numerical model. Science Direct- Energy Procedia 159, 2-9.
12. Giuliano Dall'O, A. S. (2012). The Green Energy Audit, a new procedure for suistainable auditing existing buildings integrated with LEED Protocols . Science Direct - Sustainable Cities and Society (3), 54-65.
13. K. Hassouneh, A.-S. J. (2014). Energy audit, an approach to apply the concept of green building for a building in Jordan. Science Direct-Sustainable Cities and Society (14), 456-462.
14. KESDM. (2009). PP 70 Tahun 2009 tentamg Konservasi Energi. Jakarta: KESDM.
15. Liu Xuezhi, C. Y. (2011). Analysis of Enterprise Energy Audit Countermeasure in China. Science Direct- Energy Procedia 5, 1893-1897.
16. Lorenzo Belussi, L. D. (2017). Integrated smart system for energy audit: methodology and application. Science Direct - Energy Procedia 140, 231-239.
17. Murphy, L. (2014). The influence of energy audits on energy efficiency investments of private owner-occupied households in the Netherlands . Science Direct- Energy Policy (65), 398-407.
18. Paulo Cunha, S. A. (2020). Adoption of energy efficiency measures in the buildings of micro, small-and medium -sized Portuguese enterprises . Science Direct-Energy Policy (146), 111-117.
19. Ping Yung, K. C. (2013). An audit of life cycle energy analyses of buildings. Science Direct - Habitat International (39), 43-54.
20. Pollan, M. (2006). The Omnivore’s Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals. New York: Penguin.
21. Saleh N.J. Al-Saadi, M. R.-R. (2017). Energy Management Strategies for a Govermental Building in Oman. Science Direct- Energy Procedia (141), 206-210.
22. Siti Birkha Mohd Ali, M. H. (2020). Analysis of energy consumption and potential energy savings of an institusional building in Malaysia. Science Direct-Alexandria Engineering Journal.
23. Tobias Fleiter, J. S. (2012). Adoption of energy-efficiency measures in SMEs- An empirical analysis based on energy audit data from Germany. Science Direct- Energy Policy (51), 863-875.
24. UNEP. (2016). Tools for Energy Efficiency in Building. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Centre of Energy Efficiency.
25. UNIDO. (2017). Buku Panduan Pembiayaan Efisiensi Energi bagi Industri. Jakarta: United Nations Industrial Organization.
26. UNIDO. (2017). Buku Panduan Pembiayaan Proyek Efisiensi Energi bagi Lembaga Jasa Keuangan. Jakarta: United Nation Industrial Development Organization.
